Either to M. Hazeland
observing
or to M. Millar,
that Ise Ian Tai is
clearly
not entitled to the allowance, which as explained in desp " (or 21774/93)
desp" for 21774/93) was intended zor officers aff? from home & for all other European officers not domiciled in the Colony
(2) As regards the other points raised in this despl
sprinted
? Send copies of the Straits y the subject, dated
Instinctions
23 Oct, 28 Nov. & 31th Dec. Cast, Isay
X.
Aver
objection,
" that he may, if he wisher sees no adopt similar rules; these rules it
officer will be observed provide for acting in a higher post then his outstantive office drawsing the allowance proportion to the salary he receives, and also love for the war of the period of the voyage of an officer retuming from Clave; hit
gllow it to be
^
(3) Arcregards members of the Fire
Brigade
? Say
that if [as Ibelieve is the case)
the allowances received by these men
wither
are not counted ritten for leame
ん
for pension purposes
they are on
or drawn when
leave, Lud Ripon considers
that they should not be counted for thin purpose of exchange compensation, bat
should be excluded as w
similar & Ten
"the allowances, specified in the first
X
t; y of
Justin of 28 Nov.
$5.2 ibid
Ihr Sess of the Periz
Miria
positio his post a perman one, the conting Leave A pension
f
on 1140
part of par. 1 of the Straits Rules of 28 Nov.
(4)? Ack: rec also of 310, tsay
referte se
181
that
it has been
the questions in that desp? will not now arise, as decided [as he was int
wife in tel.
of 14 Mar. I to grant the exchange Compensation without making any change in the rate opexchange for leave purposes
16/3 اسیرم
ати
C.P.I.18
Ru 2073
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.